helma.org/wiki/Workspace/philmaker/Helma Hosting

Version 8

philmaker — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:54:52 +0000

1	Jetty VPS hosting is generally preferable to Tomcat. It just seems more clean. The Helma download uses Jetty as its webserver. However, if you don't have probably the means way to host your own webapp and need a host, most Java hosts seem to use Tomcat. In addition, Java hosting tends to be more expensive that other types of hosting. Here is a hosting provider which hosts Jetty in a private JVM for $14.99.mo. I am not affiliated with this company nor have I yet employed them, this just looks like a "find".go:
2	Here are some examples:
3	http://www.slicehost.com/
4	http://www.silverrack.com/
5
6	Otherwise for Java hosting: Jetty is generally preferable to Tomcat. It just seems more clean. The Helma download uses Jetty as its webserver. However, if you don't have the means to host your own webapp and need a host, most Java hosts seem to use Tomcat. In addition, Java hosting tends to be more expensive that other types of hosting. Here is a hosting provider which hosts Jetty in a private JVM for $14.99.mo. I am not affiliated with this company nor have I yet employed them, this just looks like a "find".

Version 7

philmaker — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:31:52 +0000

5	Explain how to run Helma w/o using the included Jetty, with an existing Jetty install.

Version 6

philmaker — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:47:39 +0000

Jetty is generally preferable to Tomcat. It just seems more clean. The Helma download uses Jetty as it's its webserver. However, if you don't have the means to host your own webapp and need a host, most Java hosts seem to use Tomcat. In addition, Java hosting tends to be more expensive that other types of hosting. Here is a hosting provider which hosts Jetty in a private JVM for $14.99.mo. I am not affiliated with this company nor have I yet employed them, this just looks like a "find".

Version 5

philmaker — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:42:59 +0000

Jetty is generally preferable to Tomcat. It just seems more clean. The Helma download uses Jetty as it's webserver. However, if you don't have the means to host your own webapp and need a host, most Java hosts seem to use Tomcat. In addition, Java hosting tends to be more expensive that other types of hosting. Here is a hosting provider which hosts Jetty in a private JVM for $14.99.mo. I am not affiliated with this compnay company nor have I yet employed them, this just looks like a "find".

Version 4

philmaker — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:42:30 +0000

Jetty is generally preferable to Tomcat. It just seems cleanermore clean. The Helma download uses Jetty as it's webserver. However, if you don't have the means to host your own webapp and need a host, most Java hosts seem to use Tomcat. In addition, Java hosting tends to be more expensive that other types of hosting. Here is a hosting provider which hosts Jetty in a private JVM for $14.99.mo. I am not affiliated with this compnay nor have I yet employed them, this just looks like a "find".

Version 3

philmaker — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:42:22 +0000

Jetty is generally preferable to Tomcat. It just seems cleaner. The Helma download uses Jetty as it's webserver. However, if you don't have the means to host your own webapp and need a host, most Java hosts seem to use Tomcat. In addition, Java hosting tends to be more expensive that other types of hosting. Here is a hosting provider which hosts Jetty in a private JVM for $14.99.mo. I am not affiliated with this compnay nor have I yet employed them, this just looks like a "find".

Version 2

philmaker — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:41:53 +0000

5	(Possibly create another article for how to host using Tomcat.)
6

Version 1

philmaker — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:41:15 +0000

1	Jetty is generally preferable to Tomcat. The Helma download uses Jetty as it's webserver. However, if you don't have the means to host your own webapp and need a host, most Java hosts seem to use Tomcat. In addition, Java hosting tends to be more expensive that other types of hosting. Here is a hosting provider which hosts Jetty in a private JVM for $14.99.mo. I am not affiliated with this compnay nor have I yet employed them, this just looks like a "find".
2
3	http://www.hostjava.net/java_jetty_private.html